Running and Triathlon Coach
Friday, September 30, 2011
Monsanto spent $1.7 million lobbying gov't in 2Q
Buying Physical Gold and Silver
Doug Casey: Buying Physical Gold and Silver
(Interviewed by Louis James, Editor, International Speculator)
L: So Doug, gold has dropped from its $1,917.90 high last month down to $1,540 yesterday and is currently hovering around $1,650. I know you don't believe $1,900 was the top, but is this correction good enough – are you buying again?
Doug: Well, I hate to recommend buying anything that's gone up six or seven times in the last decade, but for all the reasons we've discussed in our recent conversations, as we exit the eye of the storm – first and foremost of which being the creation of trillions of new currency units – I am convinced gold is going much higher. So, yes, I do see the current correction as a buying opportunity.
L: In addition to the US roughly tripling its money supply in the last couple of years, the EU just announced taking its bailout fund to $2 trillion, so saying trillions is no exaggeration. But gold dropped about 20% in a month – that's a pretty impressive correction.
Doug: It's par for the course. Gold is a volatile commodity for the time being – although that will change when it's reinstituted as money. If you think about what the word "correction" means, it suggests a price either dropping back when it gets too far ahead of itself or catching up when it gets unreasonably low. If you look at longer-term – multiyear – gold charts, the surge this summer looked like gold was going vertical. Hyperbolic curves are always danger signs. Gold has now reverted to the mean it's established over the last decade.
That doesn't mean it can't go lower before heading higher, of course, but it does make this a much more reasonable time to buy than a month ago. The point to remember is that you don't want to try to trade gold. You simply want to accumulate it, as an asset. Consistently, and in quantity.
L: But a line on a price chart doesn't explain anything; it just shows us a result over time. Why do you think gold dropped in the face of exactly the sort of economic fear that should send it higher?
Doug: We saw this in 2008 as well; when the global markets get whacked – and they just got whacked hard – everything tends to dip, as various individuals and institutions are forced to sell whatever they can get a bid on to cover margin calls, redemptions, and such. As gold became more volatile, exchanges naturally raised margin requirements, which forced a lot of weak longs out of the market. Some people say it's because some "bullion banks" are in a conspiracy to suppress the price of gold, but I find that reasoning ridiculous. No bank – no government even – can fight a decade-long secular bull market… entirely apart from the fact that most US and European banks are dead men walking. They're bankrupt, and only seem alive because of massive government bailouts with newly printed paper money. Survival is the main thing on their minds now, not trying to suppress the price of some commodity they still believe is nothing more than a barbarous relic. And even if some group of fools was trying to drive down the price of gold, they'd only be giving the Chinese and the Indians a bargain as they buy more.
L: I've heard that hedge funds are the big sellers, looking to lock in gains on gold, which is still up for the year.
Doug: Very likely, in that the end of the quarter is coming up. It's possible some of these types were trying to book some wins, while building cash ahead of a possible wave of redemptions sparked by the now rampant fear in the global marketplace.
L: If that's right, the weakness in gold should dry up by the end of this week. Also, it seems to me that investors will remember that gold was the first thing to bounce back in 2008 – I suspect we'll see less correction and a quicker turnaround this time.
Doug: I agree. Plus you have all these developing economies, many of which are – ironically – in better shape than the so-called developed nations. The central banks of countries like China, India, Russia, and Taiwan have relatively little gold, and don't want to be caught holding the USD "Old Maid card." I think we'll see a lot of buying from them, taking advantage of relatively low gold prices, and that will backstop the potential downside on gold in the near term. These countries will be buying gold in ever-larger amounts – even at these prices – just to get rid of their excess hot-potato dollars. They are, in effect, offering gold buyers a free "put" on the price of the metal.
L: Okay; so when you go shopping for gold, what do you buy? Bars? Bullion jewelry? Coins?
Doug: I buy bullion coins, almost exclusively. American Eagles are now probably the most widely recognized and readily accepted bullion coin in the world – they're becoming mainstay of my stash. But I also have a lot of Canadian maple leafs, Austrian philharmonics, South African krugerrands, Mexican 50-peso coins, and the like.
The Mexican coins usually have the lowest premiums, by the way, and they're also the largest common coin, in that they contain 37.5 grams of gold, which is, not just coincidentally, equal to a Chinese tael (which is in turn equal to 1.2 troy ounces). In the Orient, people think of gold as much in taels as they do in grams or ounces. The Mexican 50 peso is perhaps the most popular coin in Latin America, especially in Argentina, where I spend a lot of time, because it's minted in grams. Krugerrands used to be the bullion standard, but they've fallen from favor.
The British sovereign is perhaps the most common gold coin, and there are several hundred million out there. It's also got a low premium, and is worth owning, since it's only 0.2354 ounces of gold – it's convenient having something about the size of a nickel that's worth around $450.
Right now there's a good opportunity in semi-numismatic gold coins too – not rare collectibles, but pre-1933 US bullion coins, like the Saint-Gaudens and other double eagles.
L: Why? I thought you didn't like rare coins for investment purposes.
Doug: I don't. Coin dealers will often try to steer buyers towards rare coins because the premiums are higher – if they sense the buyer is an easy mark, they can and will mark the coins up as much as 100%. Rare coins should only be bought by knowledgeable collectors who enjoy collecting rare coins. They shouldn't be purchased by amateurs – but the same is true of stocks.
Just to be clear, I have bought certain rare coins, particularly ancient Roman and Greek coins. I used to collect them actively. But I buy them as works of art that I find beautiful and interesting. Each one is unique and full of history. The reason we have so many is that people used to bury them, to keep them safe from government tax collectors, common thieves, and invading barbarians – but fate prevented their retrieval. Even today there are lots of hoards from ancient times discovered every year in Europe. But paying huge sums to buy coins that were massed produced a hundred or two hundred years ago make no sense to me; they have no history, and they're not usually art.
But that's not what I'm talking about. The Saint-Gaudens is a collectible – and that can be very important, if and when the government starts confiscating bullion. That's because such historic artifacts are not considered the same way modern bullion coins are – at least, last time around, they were not confiscated. Plus, because of their semi-numismatic value, they do attract a premium over the price of the gold they contain. Historically that's been between 50% and 100%. I was talking with my friend Van Simmons at David Hall Rare Coins, and as it happens, those premiums are currently down to about 12%... historic lows. Now, normally I'd rather pay a 4-5% premium – which is the current level for popular modern bullion coins – than a 12% premium. But in this case, you get both a measure of protection from confiscation, and the additional speculative upside from the potential for higher premiums in the future.
L: There's actually a rather good guide on buying rare coins in the September 2010 issue of BIG GOLD. We should also point out that Van's outfit is not the only coin dealer we recommend, and some offer special deals to Casey subscribers. There's a list of recommended bullion dealers in the July 2010 issue of BIG GOLD. For nonsubscribers, the list of recommended coin dealers includes: Miles Franklin, 800-822-8080; The Coin Agent, 888-494-8889; Border Gold, 888-312-2288, ext. 7 and Asset Strategies, 800-831-0007.
So, once you buy your coins, what do you do with them? You can't stuff them all in your mattress…
Doug: I usually try to dodge that question, in part because I don't want to publish the details of my own arrangements, and in part because the answer is different for different people in different circumstances. But first and foremost, I have to warn people not to use bank safe-deposit boxes. They are typically not insured, and they put your valuables on record – the last time the US government stole private citizens' gold, the first thing they did was seal all the bank vaults.
L: I somehow doubt that other governments would be any better.
Doug: Certainly not in places like Argentina; Argentina is great for land and living, but it's a very bad choice for anything to do with banks. Uruguay is much better in that regard, but idiotically, you have to declare your gold when you take it into the country – which you don't have to do in Argentina. In the UK, they impounded thousands of vault boxes a couple years ago, so I wouldn't go there. The UK is on the slippery slope in many ways – it was prescient to have used it as the locale for V for Vendetta. Switzerland is still good, but it's tough for Americans to get in the door there. Austria is okay. But for larger amounts, the respected, private, insured bullion storage companies are the way to go.
It's a sign of the bad times we're going into that almost nothing is safe – anywhere – from governments. Your ownership is increasingly uncertain whether you have someone store things for you, or you store things yourself. It gives you an understanding of how the Romans might have felt from the third century on.
L: And for smaller amounts? The average safe in the closet is an obvious target and won't stand up long to a determined thief with power tools and sledgehammers.
Doug Casey: That's right. And in the future, home invasions are likely to become more common in the US as well. In addition, houses can burn down – gold and silver have relatively low melting points. As paranoid as it may sound, I'd generally say that "midnight gardening" may be the best way for the average individual to store highly portable wealth securely on his or her own property. Gold is nonreactive, but remember that silver tarnishes and corrodes easily, so you want good, durable, water-tight containers to plant in your garden.
L: And… what constitutes a "smaller" amount?
Doug: I might stash a handful of coins in really good hiding places around the house for quick access in case of need – a handful of gold coins can take you almost anywhere in the world these days and pay for months of frugal living, if necessary. At present prices, gold is actually easier to transport than its value in $100 bills. As for midnight gardening, your mileage will vary, but I'd say anything on the order of $100,000 is a reasonable amount to keep under your own physical control. It's enough to do almost anything you might need to do in various scenarios, but not so much that your exposure to local risk is too high.
L: Speaking of confiscation risk, did you hear that Odyssey lost its appeal on the "Black Swan" case?
Doug: Yes, it's shameful. It's beyond me why the Spanish government should have any right to a treasure trove of coins lost hundreds of years ago and found by private entrepreneurs who put all the time, effort, and money into finding it. I'm especially sympathetic in that I spent about three months in the early '70s on a treasure hunt for sunken treasure – blockade runners off Charleston, and then in the Caribbean. I did a lot of wonderful diving, but it was a financial disaster. On the bright side, even though I didn't get the gold, I did get some great experiences.
Also on the bright side, I read that Odyssey found another sunken treasure ship off the coast of Ireland, sunk by a German U-boat in 1941. In that case they've apparently arrived at a deal to keep 80% of the proceeds.
L: Talk about international speculators – I've got to admire Odyssey. So, back to buying physical precious metals, I think we've covered the basics. Any additional thoughts?
Doug: Just remember that you buy physical gold and silver for prudence. For speculative upside, you buy gold and silver stocks. And while the precious metals have corrected, the stocks have overcorrected. There are some bargains out there, and that's excellent news given the still-high prices of the underlying commodities. Gold and silver could correct another 20%, and the kind of profitable producers Jeff Clark tracks in BIG GOLD would still make a lot of money.
But let me emphasize this as strongly as possible: We're headed into perhaps the most tumultuous time in modern history. It's critical to own a good amount of physical gold. If you, out there reading this, don't have a sufficient stash, your very next action should be to get on the phone and order some.
L: Roger that. Thanks for your thoughts.
Doug: My pleasure. And I'll see you soon, I guess.
L: That's right – our summit in Phoenix is this weekend. I wonder how many of our readers will be there…
Doug: Quite a few; we had to turn away about half of those who tried to sign up, I'm told. May they – and you – travel safely.
L: Gracias, Doug. You too.
German lawmakers voted to destroy future generations by allowing the EU to create more money to BAILOUT EUROPE'S FAILING BANKS
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Is The War On Terror A Hoax?
Is The War On Terror A Hoax?
Posted By yihan On September 30, 2011 @ 9:44 am In Featured Stories,Tile |
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Prison Planet.com
Friday, September 30, 2011
In the past decade, Washington has killed, maimed, dislocated, and made widows and orphans millions of Muslims in six countries, all in the name of the "war on terror." Washington's attacks on the countries constitute naked aggression and impact primarily civilian populations and infrastructure and, thereby, constitute war crimes under law. Nazis were executed precisely for what Washington is doing today.
Moreover the wars and military attacks have cost American taxpayers in out-of-pocket and already-incurred future costs at least $4,000 billion dollars–one third of the accumulated public debt–resulting in a US deficit crisis that threatens the social safety net, the value of the US dollar and its reserve currency role, while enriching beyond all previous history the military/security complex and its apologists.
Perhaps the highest cost of Washington's "war on terror" has been paid by the US Constitution and civil liberties. Any US citizen that Washington accuses is deprived of all legal and constitutional rights. The Bush-Cheney-Obama regimes have overturned humanity's greatest achievement–the accountability of government to law.
If we look around for the terror that the police state and a decade of war has allegedly protected us from, the terror is hard to find. Except for 9/11 itself, assuming we accept the government's improbable conspiracy theory explanation, there have been no terror attacks on the US. Indeed, as RT pointed out on August 23, 2011, an investigative program at the University of California discovered that the domestic "terror plots" hyped in the media were plotted by FBI agents. http://rt.com/usa/news/fbi-terror-report-plot-365-899/
FBI undercover agents now number 15,000, ten times their number during the protests against the Vietnam war when protesters were suspected of communist sympathies. As there apparently are no real terror plots for this huge workforce to uncover, the FBI justifies its budget, terror alerts, and invasive searches of American citizens by thinking up "terror plots" and finding some deranged individuals to ensnare. For example, the Washington DC Metro bombing plot, the New York city subway plot, the plot to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago were all FBI brainchilds organized and managed by FBI agents.
RT reports that only three plots might have been independent of the FBI, but as none of the three worked they obviously were not the work of such a professional terror organization as Al Qaeda is purported to be. The Times Square car bomb didn't blow up, and apparently could not have.
The latest FBI sting ensnared a Boston man, Rezwan Ferdaus, who is accused of planning to attack the Pentagon and US Capitol with model airplanes packed with C-4 explosives. US Attorney Carmen Ortiz assured Americans that they were never in danger, because the FBI's undercover agents were in control of the plot. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2011-09-28/DC-terrorist-plot-drone/50593792/1
Ferdaus' FBI-organized plot to blow up the Pentagon and US Capitol with model airplanes has produced charges that he provided "material support to a terrorist organization" and plotted to destroy federal buildings–the most serious charge which carries 20 imprisoned years for each targeted building.
What is the terrorist organization that Ferdaus is serving? Surely not al Qaeda, which allegedly outwitted all 16 US intelligence services, all intelligence services of America's NATO and Israeli allies, NORAD, the National Security Council, Air Traffic Control, Dick Cheney, and US airport security four times in one hour on the same morning. Such a highly capable terror organization would not be involved in such nonsense as a plot to blow up the Pentagon with a model airplane.
As an American who was in public service for a number of years and who has always stood up for the Constitution, a patriot's duty, I must hope that the question has already popped into readers' minds why we are expected to believe that a tiny model airplane is capable of blowing up the Pentagon when a 757 airliner loaded with jet fuel was incapable of doing the job, merely making a hole not big enough for an airliner.
When I observe the gullibility of my fellow citizens at the absurd "terror plots" that the US government manufactures, it causes me to realize that fear is the most powerful weapon any government has for advancing an undeclared agenda. If Ferdaus is brought to trial, no doubt a jury will convict him of a plot to blow up the Pentagon and US Capitol with model airplanes. Most likely he will be tortured or coerced into a plea bargain.
Apparently, Americans, or most of them, are so ruled by fear that they suffer no remorse from "their" government's murder and dislocation of millions of innocent people. In the American mind, one billion "towel-heads" have been reduced to terrorists who deserve to be exterminated. The US is on its way to a holocaust that makes the terrors Jews faced from National Socialism into a mere precursor.
Think about this: Are not you amazed that after a decade (2.5 times the length of WW II) of killing Muslims and destroying families and their prospects in six countries there are no real terrorist events in the US?
Think for a minute how easy terrorism would be in the US if there were any terrorists. Would an Al Qaeda terrorist from the organization that allegedly pulled off 9/11–the most humiliating defeat ever suffered by a Western power, much less "the world's only superpower"–still in the face of all the screening be trying to hijack an airliner or to blow one up?
Surely not when there are so many totally soft targets. If America were really infected with a "terrorist threat," a terrorist would merely get in the massive lines awaiting to clear airport "security" and set off his bomb. It would kill far more people than could be achieved by blowing up an airliner, and it would make it completely clear that "airport security" meant no one was safe.
It would be child's play for terrorists to blow up electric sub-stations as no one is there, nothing but a chain link fence. It would be easy for terrorists to blow up shopping centers. It would be easy for terrorists to dump boxes of roofing nails on congested streets and freeways during rush hours, tying up main transportation arteries for days. Before, dear reader, you accuse me of giving terrorists ideas, do you really think that these ideas would not already have occurred to terrorists capable of pulling off 9/11?
But nothing happens. So the FBI arrests a guy for planning to blow up America with a model airplane. It is really depressing how many Americans will believe this.
Consider also that American neoconservatives, who have orchestrated the "war on terror," have no protection whatsoever and that the Secret Service protection of Bush and Cheney is minimal. If America really faced a terrorist threat, especially one so professional to have brought off 9/11, every neoconservative along with Bush and Cheney could be assassinated within one hour on one morning or one evening.
The fact that neoconservatives such as Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Condi Rice, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, John Bolton, William Kristol, Libby, Addington, et. al., live unprotected and free of fear is proof that America faces no terrorist threat.
Think now about the airliner shoe-bomb plot, the shampoo-bottled water plot, and the underwear-bomb plot. Experts, other than the whores hired by the US government, say that these plots are nonsensical. The "shoe bomb" and "underwear bomb" were colored fireworks powders incapable of blowing up a tin can. The liquid bomb, allegedly mixed up in an airliner toilet room, has been dismissed by experts as fantasy.
What is the purpose of these fake plots? And remember, all reports confirm that the "underwear bomber" was walked onto the airliner by an official, despite the fact that the "underwear bomber" had no passport. No investigation was ever conducted by the FBI, CIA, or anyone into why a passenger without a passport was allowed on an international flight.
The purpose of these make-believe plots is to raise the fear level and to create the opportunity for former Homeland Security czar Michael Chertoff to make a fortune selling porno-scanners to the TSA.
The result of these hyped "terrorist plots" is that every American citizen, even those with high government positions and security clearances, cannot board a commercial airline flight without taking off his shoes, his jacket, his belt, submitting to a porno-scanner, or being sexually groped. Nothing could make it plainer that "airport security" cannot tell a Muslim terrorist from a gung-ho American patriot, a US Senator, a US Marine general, or a CIA operative.
If a passenger requires for health or other reasons quantities of liquids and cremes beyond the limits imposed on toothpaste, shampoo, food, or medications, the passenger must obtain prior approval from TSA, which seldom works. One of America's finest moments is the case, documented on UTube, of a dying woman in a wheelchair, who requires special food, having her food thrown away by the gestapo TSA despite the written approval from the Transportation Safety Administration, her daughter arrested for protesting, and the dying woman in the wheelchair left alone in the airport.
This is Amerika today. These assaults on innocent citizens are justified by the mindless right-wing as "protecting us against terrorism," a "threat" that all evidence shows is nonexistent.
No American is secure today. I am a former staff associate of the House Defense Appropriations subcommittee. I required high security clearances as I had access to information pertaining to all US weapons programs. As chief economist of the House Budget Committee I had information pertaining to the US military and security budgets. As Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury, I was provided every morning with the CIA's briefing of the President as well as with endless security information.
When I left the Treasury, President Reagan appointed me to a super-secret committee to investigate the CIA's assessment of Soviet capability. Afterwords I was a consult to the Pentagon. I had every kind of security clearance.
Despite my record of highest security clearances and US government confidence in me including confirmation by the US Senate in a presidential appointment, the airline police cannot tell me from a terrorist.
If I were into model airplanes or attending anti-war demonstrations, little doubt I, too, would be arrested.
After my public service in the last quarter of the 20th century, I experienced during the first decade of the 21st century all of America's achievements, despite their blemishes, being erased. In their place was erected a monstrous desire for hegemony and highly concentrated wealth. Most of my friends and my fellow citizens in general are incapable of recognizing America's transformation into a warmonger police state that has the worst income distribution of any developed country.
It is extraordinary that so many Americans, citizens of the world's only superpower, actually believe that they are threatened by Muslim peoples who have no unity, no navy, no air force, no nuclear weapons, no missiles capable of reaching across the oceans.
Indeed, large percentages of these "threat populations," especially among the young, are enamored of the sexual freedom that exists in America. Even the Iranian dupes of the CIA-orchestrated "Green Revolution" have forgotten Washington's overthrow of their elected government in the 1950s. Despite America's decade-long abusive military actions against Muslim peoples, many Muslims still look to America for their salvation.
Their "leaders" are simply bought off with large sums of money.
With the "terrorist threat" and Al Qaeda deflated with President Obama's alleged assassination of its leader, Osama bin Laden, who was left unprotected and unarmed by his "world-wide terrorist organization," Washington has come up with a new bogyman–the Haqqanis.
According to John Glaser and anonymous CIA officials, US Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Mike Mullen "exaggerated" the case against the Haqqani insurgent group when he claimed, setting up a US invasion of Pakistan, that the Hagganis were an operating arm of the Pakistan government's secret service, the ISI. Adm. Mullen is now running from his "exaggeration," an euphemism for a lie. His aid Captain John Kirby said that Mullen's "accusations were designed to influence the Pakistanis to crack down on the Haqqani Network." In other words, the Pakistanis should kill more of their own people to save the Americans the trouble.
If you don't know what the Haqqani Network is, don't be surprised. You never heard of Al Qaeda prior to 9/11. The US government creates whatever new bogymen and incidents are necessary to further the neoconservative agenda of world hegemony and higher profits for the armaments industry.
For ten years, the "superpower" American population has sat there, being terrified by the government's lies. While Americans sit in fear of non-existent "terrorists" sucking their thumbs, millions of people in six countries have had their lives destroyed. As far as any evidence exists, the vast majority of Americans are unperturbed by the wanton murder of others in countries that they are incapable of locating on maps.
Truly, Amerika is a light unto the world, an example for all.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is the father of Reaganomics and the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury. He is a columnist and was previously an editor for the Wall Street Journal. His latest book, "How the Economy Was Lost: The War of the Worlds [2]," details why America is disintegrating.
Listeria does not grow on cantaloupes: Why the 'deadliest food outbreak' of the decade is yet another food scare campaign
Listeria does not grow on cantaloupes: Why the 'deadliest food outbreak' of the decade is yet another food scare campaign
by Ethan A. Huff, staff writer(NaturalNews) Disease outbreaks associated with the US food supply have become an all-too-common occurrence these days, with at least six major outbreaks having been reported just this year alone. And with the most recent listeria outbreak affecting Colorado-sourced cantaloupes, where at least 13 people have died and 70 others have been sickened thus far, officials and the media are once again working the public into a frenzy about food safety.
On September 14, 2011, Holly, Co.-based Jensen Farms announced a recall of more than four million Rocky Ford cantaloupes it had shipped to at least 17 US states between July 29, 2011, and September 10, 2011. The recalled cantaloupes are said to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes (listeria), a bacterium not typically associated with produce, and customers are being urged to discard the dangerous fruit.
Since the recall announcement was made, the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the mainstream media have been repeatedly warning the public about the tainted melons, and citing purported death and injury numbers to apparently scare the public into paying closer attention to the issue.
On one hand, such warnings are necessary and helpful in preventing further injuries and deaths, and can be considered a public health benefit. On the other hand, they conveniently help promote the government's agenda to seize more control over the food supply through expanded "food safety" regulations.
Factory farming is responsible for spreading disease to produce
Strangely missing from all the hubbub surrounding the cantaloupe outbreak is any talk whatsoever about what actually caused the outbreak in the first place. Listeria does not just appear on produce, after all -- it is typically introduced by outside sources like factory animal feedlots, whose manure cesspools run off and contaminate nearby agriculture fields on a regular basis.Remember the massive Iowa egg recall from last year? Filthy conditions at the facilities where the eggs had been produced were, of course, responsible for the salmonella outbreak. And yet the FDA tried to use the incident to push for more power over the food supply, including the passage of S. 510, the infamous "food safety" bill (http://www.naturalnews.com/egg_reca...).
As far as the cantaloupes are concerned, a nearby factory farm is likely the source of the listeria outbreak as well. And yet instead of fully investigating the situation to determine the precise cause, government authorities will likely use this outbreak to push for even more regulatory control.
Fighting Cervical Cancer With Vinegar and Ingenuity
Fighting Cervical Cancer With Vinegar and Ingenuity
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.
POYAI, Thailand — Maikaew Panomyai did a little dance coming out of the examination room, switching her hips, waving her fists in the air and crowing, in her limited English: "Everything's O.K.! Everything's O.K.!"
Translation: The nurse just told me I do not have cervical cancer, and even the little white spot I had treated three years ago is still gone.
What allowed the nurse to render that reassuring diagnosis was a remarkably simple, brief and inexpensive procedure, one with the potential to do for poor countries what the Pap smear did for rich ones: end cervical cancer's reign as the No. 1 cancer killer of women. The magic ingredient? Household vinegar.
Every year, more than 250,000 women die of cervical cancer, nearly 85 percent of them in poor and middle-income countries. Decades ago, it killed more American women than any other cancer; now it lags far behind cancers of the lung, breast, colon and skin.
Nurses using the new procedure, developed by experts at the Johns Hopkins medical school in the 1990s and endorsed last year by the World Health Organization, brush vinegar on a woman's cervix. It makes precancerous spots turn white. They can then be immediately frozen off with a metal probe cooled by a tank of carbon dioxide, available from any Coca-Cola bottling plant.
The procedure is one of a wide array of inexpensive but effective medical advances being tested in developing countries. New cheap diagnostic and surgical techniques, insecticides, drug regimens and prostheses are already beginning to save lives.
With a Pap smear, a doctor takes a scraping from the cervix, which is then sent to a laboratory to be scanned by a pathologist. Many poor countries lack high-quality labs, and the results can take weeks to arrive.
Women who return to distant areas where they live or work are often hard to reach, a problem if it turns out they have precancerous lesions.
Miss Maikaew, 37, could have been one of them. She is a restaurant cashier on faraway Ko Chang, a resort island. She was home in Poyai, a rice-farming village, for a brief visit and was screened at her mother's urging.
The same thing had happened three years ago, and she did have a white spot then. (They resemble warts, and are caused by the human papillomavirus.) It was frozen off with cryotherapy, which had hurt a little, but was bearable, she said.
Since she has been screened twice in her 30s, her risk of developing cervical cancer has dropped by 65 percent, according to studies by the Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention, a coalition of international health organizations funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The procedure, known as VIA/cryo for visualization of the cervix with acetic acid (vinegar) and treatment with cryotherapy, can be done by a nurse, and only one visit is needed to detect and kill an incipient cancer.
Thailand has gone further than any other nation in adopting it. More than 20 countries, including Ghana and Zimbabwe, have done pilot projects. But in Thailand, VIA/cryo is now routine in 29 of 75 provinces, and 500,000 of the 8 million women, ages 30 to 44, in the target population have been screened at least once.
Dr. Bandit Chumworathayi, a gynecologist at Khon Kaen University who helped run the first Thai study of VIA/cryo, explains that vinegar highlights the tumors because they have more DNA, and thus more protein and less water, than other tissue.
It reveals pre-tumors with more accuracy than a typical Pap smear. But it also has more false positives — spots that turn pale but are not malignant. As a result, some women get unnecessary cryotherapy.
But freezing is about 90 percent effective, and the main side effect is a burning sensation that fades in a day or two.
By contrast, biopsies, the old method, can cause bleeding.
"Some doctors resist" the cryotherapy approach, said Dr. Wachara Eamratsameekool, a gynecologist at rural Roi Et Hospital who helped pioneer the procedure. "They call it 'poor care for poor people.' This is a misunderstanding. It's the most effective use of our resources."
At a workshop, nurse trainees pored over flash cards showing cervixes with diagnosable problems. They did gynecological exams on lifelike mannequins with plastic cervixes. They performed cryotherapy on sliced frankfurters pinned deep inside plastic pipes. Then, after lunch, they broke into small groups and went by minibus to nearby rural clinics to practice on real women.
Because cervical cancer takes decades to develop, it is too early to prove that Thailand has lowered its cancer rate. In fact, Roi Et Province, where mass screening first began, has a rate higher than normal, but doctors attribute that to the extra testing. But of the 6,000 women recruited 11 years ago for the first trial, not a single one has developed full-blown cancer.
VIA/cryo was pioneered in the 1990s simultaneously by Dr. Paul D. Blumenthal, an American gynecologist working in Africa, and Dr. Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan in India.
Dr. Blumenthal said he and colleagues at the Johns Hopkins medical school had debated ways to make cervical lesions easier to see, and concluded that whitening them with acetic acid would be effective. Freezing off lesions is routine in gynecology and dermatology; the challenge was making it cheap and easy. Liquid nitrogen is hard to get, but carbon dioxide is readily available.
Thailand seems made for the vinegar technique. It has more than 100,000 nurses and a network of rural clinics largely run by them.
Also, while poor rural villagers in many countries go to shamans or herbalists before they see doctors, poor Thais do not. Thailand has a 95 percent literacy rate, and doctors are trusted. The king is the son of a doctor and a nurse; his father trained at Harvard. One of the royal princesses has a doctorate in chemistry and an interest in cancer research.
But the real secret, Dr. Wachara said, is this: "Thailand has Lady Kobchitt."
Dr. Kobchitt Limpaphayon to her colleagues at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University medical school and "Kobbie" to her classmates long ago at New York's Albany Medical College, she is the gynecologist to the Thai royal family. "Kobbie is a force of nature," said Dr. Blumenthal, who has taught with her. In 1971, as a young doctor, she moved from Albany to Baltimore to help start the Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics.
In 1999, she read one of Dr. Blumenthal's papers and asked him to introduce VIA/cryo in Thailand. Without her connections and powers of persuasion, said Dr. Bandit, it would have been impossible to get the conservative Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to give up Pap smears, or to persuade Parliament to allow nurses to do cryotherapy, a procedure previously reserved for doctors.
The free screenings at public clinics are crucial to people like Yupin Promasorn, 36, who was part of Miss Maikaew's group.
She sells snacks in Bangkok, and her husband drives a tuk-tuk motorcycle taxi. With two children, she has no time to wait at Bangkok's jammed public hospitals, and she is too poor to see a private doctor. So she and her husband drove the 12 hours here, to her native village, in his tuk-tuk. When she found out she was negative, she sat in a chair fanning herself.
"I feel like a heavy mountain is gone from my chest," she said.
Gardasil mother speaks out: SANEVAX vaccine injury victim SUPPORT LINE
Gardasil mother speaks out: SANEVAX vaccine injury victim support line
by Rosemary Mathis, Vice President of Victim Support, SANE VAX, INC.(NaturalNews) When vaccine injury occurs and the medical community fails to recognize or diagnose the injury, parents all over the world turn to SANEVAX, INC. for support and guidance. The SANEVAX Vaccine Injury support line is a lifeline to parents of victims of Gardasil and other vaccines. One mother tells her experience regarding the support she received during this very frightening time in her life.
As the mother of a girl who has suffered injury due to the Gardasil, the HPV vaccine, I know firsthand how important the Victims Hotline at SANEVAX.ORG is. We live in a small city in Wyoming with limited medical resources. When my daughter became ill in March of 2011, the medical community in our community was unable and unwilling to treat her. I was advised by our pediatrician that nothing could be done for my daughter and that I should take her home and 'wait and see' and 'hope for the best.'
But I knew in my heart that was not what we should do. I knew that it simply was not enough. So, I searched online and found SANEVAX and the Victim's Hotline . I contacted several of the names on the hotline via email. I received immediate responses from them. Many of the volunteers were mothers of Gardasil victims. The information the volunteers shared with me was invaluable and it helped save my daughter's life. The hotline volunteers shared contact information for medical practitioners, and alternative practitioners with experience in treating Gardasil victims. I was also provided practical information about other therapies victim used with success.
At the time, I was desperate, frustrated, angry, confused and scared but the support and information I received from the hotline volunteers gave me real hope that my daughter would recover. I will never be able to thank the Hotline volunteers enough for their willingness to help, to listen, and most of all, to share what they knew from their own personal experiences. My daughter's condition is much improved, due in large part, to the information and support I received from the hotline. I am eternally grateful to them.
According to VAERS (the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), as of August 2011, there were 23,388 victims reporting injuries resulting from the Gardasil vaccine This number includes both male and female victims, although female victims currently outnumber male victims. It is believed that the incidence of injury is widely under-reported to due to misinformation and that the actual number of victims is much higher than current statistics reflect.
Despite the alarming number of reported injuries related to the Gardasil vaccine, the vaccine continues to be administered to both boys and girls ages 9 to 26 across the nation and it may soon be a required vaccination in many states. Those who have been injured by Gardasil continue to suffer its devastating effects and more children are vaccinated and become victims every day. All of these victims and their families are searching for information and support that is not easily found in the medical community or in their circles of friends and family. Consequently, the need for Hotline Volunteers is tremendous.
The Hotline is a valuable resource for parents and victims to use to talk to others in their home state, across the nation, and around the world regarding their child's injury resulting from Gardasil. Hotline Volunteers are most often parents of victims, a concerned person or relative close to a victim of Gardasil, or sometimes a Gardasil victim. Volunteers have a thorough understanding of Gardasil Vaccine Injury. Hotline Volunteers do not offer medical advice at any time to anyone. However, contact information for medical practitioners, alternative medicine practitioners, and an abundance of useful information is offered free of charge. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Hotline Volunteers can provide emotional support to victims and their families.
As a result of the recent media coverage of the political debates and the mention of the controversy surrounding Gardasil, we anticipate the possibility of more victims of Gardasil coming forward in the coming months. It is the goal of the Sane Vax Hotline to offer those victims and their families support and provide them with helpful information. We currently have volunteers in sixteen states and hope to have at least one Hotline Volunteer in every state soon. Sane Vax also has Hotline Volunteers in thirteen countries around the world.
If you or someone you know is interested in becoming a Hotline Volunteer, please send an email to sanevax@charter.net, and enter "VACCINE HOTLINE" in the email's subject line. Please go to SANEVAX for more information on injuries resulting from Gardasil and how you can help.
This article was written by DeAnna Martinez, mother of a victim of the GARDASIL HPV Vaccine and Contributing Author for SANEVAX, INC.
Resources:
Victim Hotline http://sanevax.org/resources/vaccin...
SANEVAX Website http://sanevax.org/
About the author:
THE SANE VAX MISSION is to promote Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices through education and information. We believe in science-based medicine. Our primary goal is to provide the information necessary for you to make informed decisions regarding your health and well-being. We also provide referrals to helpful resources for those unfortunate enough to have experienced vaccine-related injuries.
Articles on this site are written by Norma Erickson, President and Leslie Carol Botha, women's health educator, broadcast journalist and Vice-President Public Relations for SANE Vax, Inc. We also allow content from various contributing authors. Other members include Rosemary Mathis, mother of a Gardasil-injured daughter and Vice President Victim Support; Janny Stokvis, Vice-President Research, Freda Birrell, Secretary and HPV vaccine lobbyist United Kingdom /Scotland, and Linda Thompson, Treasurer.
We are demanding the HPV vaccines be taken off the market until an independent study on their safety and efficacy has been conducted. Until then, we are committing our efforts to an educational media campaign to alert the public about the dangers of the HPV vaccines.
SANE Vax, Inc. is involved in the ground-breaking production of the One More Girl Documentary which will premier in 2012. Please join our cause by contributing to this project by contacting Ryan Richardson, Producer at ryan@onemoregirlfilm.com
For more information, please visit our site at http://sanevax.org/.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
How American Nutritionists are Manipulated by the Food Industry
How American Nutritionists are Manipulated by the Food Industry
Posted By Dr. Mercola | September 29 2011 |
The American Dietetic Association (ADA) has approximately 72,000 members, most of whom are registered dietitians. The association is known for accrediting nutrition programs, credentialing professionals, publishing peer-reviewed science, and advocating for public policy. But it has also provoked increasing controversy by working with some of the nation's largest industrial food producers.
At their annual Food & Nutrition Conference and Expo (FNCE), the show floor contained booths and displays from Monsanto, Hershey's, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Cargill, Yum! Brands, Nestle, ConAgra, Mars, Inc., Campbell's, and General Mills.
According to Grist:
"Members look at issues like antibiotic use in animals, clean water issues, and social justice, often finding themselves uncomfortably at odds with some of the messages being promoted by the speakers and corporate sponsors at the FNCE conference. Some have even opted out entirely, giving up the networking, camaraderie, and learning opportunities offered by the conference altogether ... [and] corporate influence among [dieticians] isn't limited to the ADA."
Sources:
The 7 Laws of Leanness
The 7 Laws of Leanness
Posted By Dr. Mercola | September 29 2011 |
LAW #1: Lean People Don't Diet: Muscle mass is your body's number-one calorie burner. By dieting, you're setting yourself up to gain more weight than ever.
LAW #2: Lean People Don't Go Fat-Free: Fat doesn't make you fat; you need fat in your diet to help you process certain nutrients.
LAW #3: Lean People Sit Down to Eat: Eating more slowly and savoring your meal boosts levels of two hormones that make you feel fuller.
LAW #4: Lean People Know What They're Going to Eat Next: Planning your responses to hunger helps you shed pounds faster.
LAW #5: Lean People Eat Protein: Those who eat moderately high levels of protein are twice as likely to lose weight and keep it off as those who don't eat much protein.
LAW #6: Lean People Move Around: Fit people stay fit by having fun.
LAW #7: Lean People Watch Less TV: Nearly 30 percent of people who watch more than four hours of TV a day have a BMI of 30 or higher.
Sources:
MUST READ-Police State Tactics- CDC now calling U.S. households and demanding child immunization records as part of vaccine surveillance and tracking program
CDC now calling U.S. households and demanding child immunization records as part of vaccine surveillance and tracking program
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor(NaturalNews) The U.S. Centers for Disease Control, which has been comprehensively exposed as a vaccine propaganda organization promoting the interests of drug companies, is now engaged in a household surveillance program that involves calling U.S. households and intimidating parents into producing child immunization records. As part of what it deems a National Immunization Survey (NIS), the CDC is sending letters to U.S. households, alerting them that they will be called by "NORC at the University of Chicago" and that households should "have your child's immunization records handy when answering our questions." (See copies of the letter, below.)
This NIS vaccine compliance program is revealed in a letter being sent to U.S. households by Edward J. Sondik, PhD, the director of the National Center for Health Statistics at the CDC. The CDC, you may recall, was instrumental in pushing the false swine flu pandemic scare and encouraging governments to order billions of dollars worth of vaccines from drug companies. Following this marketing fraud, the former head of the CDC, Dr. Julie Gerberding, went on to accept the lucrative job as the president of Merck's global vaccine division (http://www.naturalnews.com/027789_D...). One of the CDC's top researchers who worked under Gerberding, Dr. Poul Thorsen, was later indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly stealing grant money and using it to buy luxury cars and motorcycles (http://www.naturalnews.com/032216_T...).
Now the CDC is bullying parents across the USA to comply with child immunization surveillance programs by calling their home phones and asking them to produce child immunization records.
NaturalNews has acquired a copy of the letter being sent by the CDC, which you can view in these two images:
http://www.naturalnews.com/images/C...
http://www.naturalnews.com/images/C...
Vaccine compliance tracking
"Your phone number was chosen randomly by computer," explains the letter, which goes on to say that the CDC will use your information to generate a map of vaccine compliance -- no doubt to later target low-compliance areas with increased vaccination propaganda or even court-ordered immunization mandates like the one we witnessed in Maryland (http://www.naturalnews.com/022242_m...)."It is important for us to interview every household we call to get a complete picture of your area's immunization rates," the CDC letter explains. "Your answers to the NIS will provide information to help improve the nation's health now and in the years ahead," it continues. Which means, of course, that this information will be used to push more vaccines onto more infants by targeting areas with low vaccine compliance rates, such as African American neighborhoods which are rightly skeptical of government's claims about vaccines.
Note that in this letter, the CDC admits it is using this information to track vaccine compliance at the local level. On top of that, the NORC.org website openly admits this is all about public health surveillance, saying: "the NIS is one of the largest telephone surveys in the nation and its data are considered the gold standard for public health surveillance on immunization rates."
Ever notice how these organizations are so aggressive at tracking vaccination rates but they care nothing about tracking rates of autism? Have you wondered why they aren't calling U.S. households and asking parents whether their children became autistic after receiving vaccines? (Gee, maybe they don't want to know the answer to that question...)
Public health surveillance = interrogations by phone
Once your private home phone is called as part of this vaccine surveillance and tracking program, you will be essentially interrogated over the phone about your vaccine immunization compliance:"Respondents are asked a series of questions about the vaccinations received by selected children (including recommended seasonal flu vaccines)," says NORC. And after that, NORC will request permission to acquire your child's immunization records from your doctor!
"Respondents are also asked for permission to contact the children's health providers for the sole purpose of obtaining immunization records, providing an important supplement to the household report," NORC explains. Yes, once you answer the interrogation questions on the phone, they will then go straight to your doctor to acquire vaccine records there in order to determine whether you were lying on the phone.
See our screen capture of the NORC.org website which admits all this:
http://www.naturalnews.com/images/N...
The original source of this is: http://www.norc.org/Research/Projec... (but they will no doubt change their page after this NaturalNews story goes live, which is why we posted a screen shot).
It's all admittedly a way to increase vaccination rates of low-income children
"NORC then sends an Immunization History Questionnaire via mail to these health providers," it says. And once the data are compiled: "These data are used by the CDC and state and local public health agencies to monitor the potential for disease outbreaks at the community level and to allocate resources for the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program, which ensures that all children in the U.S. have access to vaccinations regardless of financial status."In other words, the CDC, working on behalf of the drug companies, wants to make sure that all children are vaccinated even if their parents can't afford it. That's government being "helpful" to its slaves, you see. "Public health" has been so perverted and distorted under the government / pharmaceutical collusion regime that instead of teaching people how to prevent disease with nutritious foods, vitamin D and low-cost natural cures, the government is all about injecting infants with vaccines, irradiating women's breasts with mammograms, and outlawing dietary supplements while claiming to be working under the label of "public health."
And now, thanks to the police state tactics being increasingly used by the federal government to enforce vaccines even at gunpoint (as we saw in Maryland), it appears we are about to enter a phase where it's not just TSA reaching down your pants, but CDC running vaccine surveillance and compliance tracking in order to make sure no one goes unvaccinated in America.
Enhanced government surveillance for teen vaccination rates
This vaccine compliance tracking and surveillance program is also being used to target teens and to push for increased vaccination rates using flu vaccines. As NORC admits on its website: "In response to the need for improved surveillance on teen immunization rates, CDC expanded the use of the NIS sampling frame in 2008 to screen households for the presence of teens between 13-17 years of age."But flu vaccines are scientifically useless and simply don't work on 99 out of 100 people who receive them (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_v...). Besides, flu vaccines only contain DNA proteins from last year's flu strains, meaning that even if you believe flu vaccines work, they would only be useful to time travelers who go back in time to the previous year's flu season. And this is all in addition to the fact that flu vaccines actually weaken the immune system and make you more vulnerable to future flu infections. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_s...)
Flu vaccines also cause seizures (http://www.naturalnews.com/029334_f...), vomiting, fevers and other dangerous or even deadly side effects (http://www.naturalnews.com/029586_A...).
Ties to the military industrial complex
Under a heading called "Advances in Survey Research," NORC adds something that should raise some red flags among privacy advocates, saying "In collaboration with CDC, NORC has spearheaded an ambitious research program to identify best practices for sampling landline and cell telephones and develop valid statistical approaches for weighting and estimation."Cell phones? Ambitious research programs? This only begins to make sense when you realize that the CDC awarded $5 billion grant money to computer surveillance and weapons contractors to develop aggressive public health (vaccine compliance) surveillance programs (http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/...). Northrup Grumman is a weapons manufacturer that has been caught by the U.S. State Department selling technology secrets to the Russians and violating international arms trafficking laws by selling computer guidance systems to Israel and China, among other countries (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northr...).
If this seems surprising, remember that the Institute of Medicine, another key propaganda mouthpiece for the vaccine industry, is funded in part by the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security. It also receives money from junk food companies and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, an aggressive vaccine-pushing non-profit. This was all exposed in an exclusive NaturalNews article available here: http://www.naturalnews.com/033455_I...
What's clear from all this is that today's government-run "public health" fiasco is really all about the following:
Vaccines - Surveillance - Compliance - Tracking - Military - Weapons
This is all being conducted like a military operation, not a compassionate public health initiative that genuinely seeks to save the lives of children. If the CDC really wanted to save lives, it would aggressively promote vitamin D, which can prevent nearly all winter flu cases, cancer cases (http://www.naturalnews.com/021892.html) and even kidney disease or osteoporosis. But instead of recommending affordable solutions that really work, the CDC focuses its billions of dollars in taxpayer money on tracking household compliance with deadly vaccines.
This is public health? Get real.
Non-compliant households to be added to quarantine list?
What the CDC is also probably not telling you is that people who answer the survey and admit they have not given their children vaccines could in theory be added to a quarantine list to be arrested and thrown into FEMA camps during the next pandemic outbreak.The recent "terror exercise" in Denver, called Operation Mountain Guardian featured government SWAT teams and armed military-style squads entering public schools and terrorizing children with simulated gunfire and explosions, then conducting secret mass-arrest exercises in a large sports stadium. As Alex Jones explains on InfoWars.com, this is all practice for kidnapping children, taking them to stadiums, then calling parents to come pick them up at which point the parents are then arrested and taken away by law enforcement authorities (http://www.infowars.com/denver-terr...) while the children are turned over to the state.
The children are essentially used as "bait" to arrest parents who happen to be on whatever government "lists" are considered offensive. If your name is on a list provided by the CDC, claiming that you are a "bad parent" because you refuse to vaccinate your children, you could have those children taken away by the state -- at gunpoint!
This is similar to what happened recently with Maryanne Godboldo in Detroit, who was subjected to a 12-hour SWAT team standoff because she refused to medicate her teenage daughter with dangerous psychiatric drugs (http://www.naturalnews.com/032091_M...).
Of course, the CDC claims your privacy will be protected in all this (yeah, right). "Strict U.S. laws require that we protect your family's information and keep it confidential," the CDC's letter says. Importantly, however, there is nothing in the CDC's letter that says it will not violate those laws. So it's really just clever lawyer-speak to say that "laws require we protect your information" without saying the CDC will abide by those laws.
After all, there are strict U.S. laws that prevent the ATF from running guns into Mexico, but it violated those laws anyway (http://www.naturalnews.com/032934_A...). There are strict U.S. laws that require the President to seek Congressional approval for acts of war, but those laws have been violated routinely for decades. There are strict U.S. laws that protect the due process of U.S. citizens, and yet the U.S. is steeped in illegal secret prisons and torture initiatives that were rolled out under Bush and yet have actually been expanded under the Obama administration. In fact, if there's anything we've all learned about watching the federal government over the last decade, it's that the government will openly and brazenly violate whatever laws it wants in order to get what it wants. This is especially true in health care, where the FDA, for its part, openly engaged in illegal international abductions of American citizens (http://www.naturalnews.com/033573_F...) in order to oppress herbal cancer cures that really work.
And the CDC, we all know, wants increased "vaccine compliance" so that vaccine makers earn more profits from selling these deadly injections to parents who have no idea those vaccines are making their children autistic (or even killing them).
The real agenda of this entire vaccine survey becomes crystal clear at the end of the CDC's letter, which pushes a vaccine agenda with the question: "How do I find out more about immunizations and places to get them?" It then gives out a toll-free number to call to "get the phone number of a doctor of clinic near you."
When the CDC calls your house, don't answer
The message is quite clear in all this: We're from the government, we're going to be calling your private home phone number and asking you questions about your child's immunization history. We want you to produce your child's vaccination records. We will also acquire your doctor's vaccine records to find out if you are lying. The information will be used to track vaccine compliance in your area. And if you want to get "compliant," here's a government phone number to call which will direct you to the nearest vaccine center.If your receive one of these letters from the CDC, the safest thing to do in all this is screen all your phone calls and simply refuse to answer your phone. Just refuse to talk with them at all. After four or five attempts, they will figure you're never home and probably stop calling. Do NOT speak to them and tell them you are opposed to vaccines, or you may suddenly find yourself being visited by Child Protective Services or government thugs wielding loaded firearms pointed at your head. (This is no longer just a theory. It's factually true.)
The vaccine industry, remember, is running a kind of modern-day McCarthyism, where being intelligently opposed to vaccines is a lot like being accused of being a "Communist" back in the McCarthy era. The government is now admittedly using weapons technology companies, phone surveillance techniques, immunization tracking and statistical analysis to find out who is not being vaccinated. These are police state tactics now being used by the vaccine industry -- in collusion with dangerous government mandates and rogue CPS agents -- to attack your freedom of choice and your right to make parental decisions about the health of your child.
And it's all being done under the false Orwellian mantra that "VACCINES ARE THE SOLUTION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH!" It's all a complete lie, of course. Vaccines cause autism, live viral infections, seizures, comas and even deaths. That's because they contain neurologically damaging adjuvants such as aluminum! They also contain "stealth viruses" that can cause cancer and autoimmune disorders. SANE Vax, Inc. recently found HPV vaccines to be contaminated with the rDNA of HPV viral strains (http://www.naturalnews.com/033585_G...), and vaccine manufacturers have been caught placing live viral strains directly into the vaccines! (http://www.naturalnews.com/025760.html)
Perhaps even more shockingly, a top Merck vaccine scientist, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, openly admitted that polio vaccines were contaminated with 40 unknown viral strains, including some strains that caused cancer. Read the incredible transcript of this secret recording at: http://www.naturalnews.com/033584_D...
What we are all suffering under today, friends, is a vaccine-pushing police state and its accompanying Ministry of Truth (the CDC and FDA). This is not about public health, it's about injecting infants and maximizing the profits of the vaccine manufacturers, even if countless children and teens are permanently harmed as a result.
Share this story far and wide. Let people know what's really going on with the CDC and vaccine compliance surveillance programs. And keep reading NaturalNews.com for more breaking news articles that reveal the true agenda of the criminally-operated vaccine industry.