Drug Companies Are Sexualizing Our Kids!
By Christina England | November 1st, 2011 | Category: By Author, Christina England, Top Stories | 6 Comments and 6 ReactionsRecently, there has been a vast amount of media coverage exposing many leading stores sexualizing children through the marketing of inappropriate clothing. Mini skirts, crop tops, and sexy under-wear for primary school children, even high heels for toddlers fill the shelves, leaving parents shocked and outraged.
One little girl Suri Cruise, the daughter of Tom Cruise, is often seen teetering around in high heels whilst wearing bright red lip gloss at the tender age of five. In fact this very young child even has her own 'fashion blog', showing interested readers her vast array of tiny high heels whilst sharing her latest fashion tips.
Whilst many parents appear outraged by this seemingly blatant sexploitation of such a young child and are sharing their feelings of disgust on various blogs around the internet, the same emotion evades parents completely when it comes to vaccination. Parents are only too happy to have their little darlings vaccinated with the latest must have vaccine for sexually transmitted diseases and happily sign consent forms without giving it a second thought.
Why is it, that there is not the same level of disgust and outrage when drug companies recommend children from birth vaccinations for sexual diseases? Don't American parents realize that the government has mandated a vaccination for a venereal disease at birth?
In fact Dr Judith Reisman goes as far as to say these vaccines are little more than 'condoms in the veins'.
The US government insists that children are vaccinated with the Hepatitis B vaccine on the day that they are born. Hepatitis B is a STD or SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE therefore, it is highly unlikely that a tiny baby is going to come into contact with this disease unless they have shared needles, had sex with an infected person or has received contaminated blood.
This being the case, the only possible way that a newborn baby can get Hepatitis B is by having an infected mother give birth to them. So why is the US government insistent that all babies are vaccinated? Why do they not simply identify pregnant mothers who have the disease and vaccinate just those babies? Or better still not give this highly toxic and dangerous vaccination at all?
Dr Reisman is clearly disgusted by what she sees and states:
"Just look at child vaccines. The more pornography and sexology increase juvenile sexual activity, the more big pharma can step in with an Hepatitis B vaccine for infants. HepB is a sexually transmitted disease, and there is no reason to give the vaccine to babies. But big pharma has been making a fortune on it ever since states have begun mandating that all of our little darlings, with their wee tiny hearts and lungs and no immune system functioning, be shot up with it (and recently small girls with Human Papilloma Virus, HPV vaccines) all in the name of protecting them. What we don't want to do is turn off the pornography flood (no administration has chosen to do that) because it fuels so many other things. And in the wings are vaccines for syphilis and gonorrhea and a whole host of other sexually transmitted diseases."
She is a strong lady with powerful views and I believe she is correct in her assumptions.
At the ages of nine through twelve, young girls and boys are now recommended the HPV vaccine. Once again this vaccine, according to the manufacturers Merck and GlaxoSmithKline, is for an STD which has been said to cause cervical cancer. I say 'said to cause cervical cancer', as there appears to be very little evidence available to support this theory.
Dr Sin Hang Lee who now works with the group Sane Vax says:
FACT:
The current type-specific HPV vaccines have claimed to be almost 100% effective against infection by HPV-16 and HPV-18, and perhaps also against HPV-31 and HPV-45 infections. However, we do not know if these four HPV types are the most prevalent carcinogenic HPV genotypes in the US. According to two published reports – one by the CDC, HPV-52 not HPV-16 or HPV-18 was found to be the most prevalent "carcinogenic" genotype infecting young American women.
It is not transient HPV infections, but a persistent high-risk HPV infection that may initiate cervical cancer… Therefore, it is the persistent infection, not the virus that determines cervical cancer risk.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee -Pathologist, Milford Hospital
Director, Milford Medical Laboratory, Milford, CT
Despite this lack of evidence however, Jerry Brown feels so strongly about children being vaccinated with this particular vaccine, he recently felt the compelling need to waiver parental rights to protect their children and has passed a bill stating that children can choose to have this vaccine without parental consent.
This vaccine is being given to children at a time when they should be climbing trees, riding their bikes and enjoying life, not worrying about sexually transmitted diseases.This move has led to discord among parents. I am beginning to wonder if the parental anger has more to do with their parental rights being taken away than their children being given a vaccine for a sexually transmitted disease.
The next STD vaccine which has been lined up for our children is the Chlamydia vaccine. Scientists in Southampton have recently announced that they are confident that they will have the vaccine ready for use very soon.
What I am seeing is a worldwide tragedy. Drug companies are beginning to feel the need to sexualize and pimp our children along with shops, schools, and governments. Our young, innocent children are becoming sexually aware at an earlier and earlier age. Instead of playing with dolls, girls as young as ten years of age have been thrown into a world of sleepless nights and nappy changing.
Gone are morals and talk of love. These have been replaced by young boys barely old enough to shave, boasting about how many 'chicks they have laid.'
Instead of our schools teaching children right from wrong, they are giving out the morning after pill and condoms without the consent of the parent along with sex leaflets and a vaccination just to be on the safe side.
Is this they way we want our world to be? Is this really the best way forward? I for one believe that sex education at primary school is just paving the way to even more prostitution, rape and teenage pregnancy. Bring back good old fashioned 'birds and the bees' talks from parents and lectures on love any day. Vaccinations for sexually transmitted diseases at birth are, in my opinion, wrong and I think Judith Reisman is spot on when she writes:
Although a government program to inoculate children's bodies for use by sexual predators seems maniacal, our bureaucrats have mandated just such an insane public health policy requiring that the delicate, developing physiological systems of all healthy infants be vaccinated for HepB, and girls of about age nine be also vaccinated for HPV, again, both preventable STDs…
We need more Judith Reisman's in the world and less sexual exploitation of our children. Please give VacTruth your views and opinions.
No comments:
Post a Comment